X

Paging Professor Obama: WSJ Editorial Says the President “Needs a Remedial Course in Judicial Review”

President Obama and Washington Democrats are growing increasingly desperate in their efforts to defend their unpopular health care law.  Yesterday, the president “went too far” – in the words of liberal Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus – and attacked the Supreme Court.  

 
The Wall Street Journal editorial page weighed in this morning, and noted that the former constitutional law professor “needs a remedial course in judicial review” and said that “as he runs for re-election, Mr. Obama's inner community organizer seems to be winning out over the law professor”: 
 
“President Obama is a former president of the Harvard Law Review and famously taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago. But did he somehow not teach the historic case of Marbury v. Madison?  
 
“That's a fair question after Mr. Obama's astonishing remarks on Monday at the White House when he ruminated for the first time in public on the Supreme Court's recent ObamaCare deliberations. ‘I'm confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress,’ he declared.
 
“Presidents are paid to be confident about their own laws, but what's up with that ‘unprecedented’? In Marbury in 1803, Chief Justice John Marshall laid down the doctrine of judicial review. In the 209 years since, the Supreme Court has invalidated part or all of countless laws on grounds that they violated the Constitution. All of those laws were passed by a ‘democratically elected’ legislature of some kind, either Congress or in one of the states…
 
“One reason the law may be overturned is because it was rushed through Congress without a standard ‘severability’ clause that says that the rest of the law stands if one part is judged unconstitutional. Congress jammed it into law because it became ever more unpopular the more the public looked at it. The law is even less popular today than it was on the day it passed in 2010.
 
Mr. Obama's remarks suggest he is joining others on the left in warning the Justices that they will pay a political price if they dare to overturn even part of the law. As he runs for re-election, Mr. Obama's inner community organizer seems to be winning out over the law professor.”
 
One can understand President Obama’s frustration – the Supreme Court’s hearings have only made ObamaCare more unpopular and have shined a light on the Presidents’ unconstitutional health care law that’s only making it harder for small businesses to hire new workers.   
 
As Speaker Boehner said, “there can be no letup until ObamaCare is fully repealed.”